Editor's Note:I originally published this on May 17, 2015. Not all of the links work any longer.RK
To quote a man who – if he had really lived – would have
to be considered one of the world's unique moralists, Captain Renault, played
by Claude Rains in Casablanca as he’s ordered to close Rick’s American Café for
political reasons:
Renault: I am shocked, shocked to find that gambling is
going on in here!
Employee of Rick's: [hands Renault money] Your winnings, sir.
Renault: Oh, thank you, very much. Everybody out at once!
“The Washington
Post’s Erik Wemple says what everyone else is thinking when it comes to George
Stephanopoulos’ recent interview of Clinton Cash author Peter Schweitzer.
Instead of simply being a good interview about an important book at the start
of a Presidential election campaign… perhaps the interview was actually an
attempt by a liberal activist and Clinton ally to put out a fire before it
began raging.
We’re all talking about this media stuff. But, yes, I think that
when George Stephanopoulos goes on with a major figure and talks about, you
know, the “Clinton Cash” book or whatever, I could sense that he was going
after Peter Schweitzer. At the time, it looked like legitimate journalism. In
retrospect, it looks like activism”.
And everyone's shocked? Over the weekend a number of Fox News shows
had their talking heads (for clarity sake, I actually like some of the talking
heads) do some commentary on this issue. I might point out since it wasn’t
corruption by a conservative the MSM pretty much ignored the issue.
But there’s
no liberal bias….or it’s very limited ....Right? After all…. there’s no such thing as a
conspiracy. Right?
Of course there are those small minded individuals who will wonder if it’s possible
there’s a bigger reason why there’s so little coverage by the left wing media.
Is it possible this is a deeper story than just good old George? Is it possible
they’re all guilty of this kind of stuff? Nah, that can’t be true! They’re full
of liberal purity, like the Clintons, and the Kennedy’s.
There were two things that I found amazing.
First off, it
amazes me just how many people actually watch this guy. Oh, I know the numbers
on the MSM are dwindling, but he still has quite a following. I never watched
him for more than a few minutes total since his very first show. Why? Because
he made his bones as a Clintonista left wing operative and a spin master. It’s
part and parcel of who he is. Why would anyone think he would change? He just
gets paid a whole lot more from ABC for spinning the truth than he did when he
was paid by the Clinton administration for spinning the truth.
Secondly, it never ceases to amaze me how many in
the media, including Karl Rove, who attempted to claim Stephanopoulos had made
the transition in everyone’s mind from a Democratic activist to a journalist.
It reminds me of a time when conservative commentators– perhaps I
should say seeming conservative commentators - were crying crocodile tears a
few years ago because of the New York Times financial problems, fearing the Old Gray Hag would go out of business.
All that hand wringing irrespective of the
well known historical facts showing the NYT has been a left wing
treasonous canker sore
on the butt of journalism since the Roosevelt administration. One reader
pointed out his operative status was only a“secret from other media types, which
explains why you can't trust any of them, because at best they're only a 5 watt
bulb, when a 100 watt bulb is what is needed for that type of job”.
Greg Gutfeld – one of Fox’s
talking heads I like – is quoted in the article as she says:
“there is even more
reason for concern for ABC. Because on the heels of the Stephanopoulos –
Schweitzer interview, the Clintons used the piece to try to discredit the book
and its author. They sourced each other, that’s the great thing. It’s like the
Clinton campaign fact checks Schweizer’s book, and then Stephanopoulos uses
that in the interview and then Clinton goes back to the Stephanopoulos
interview and says,“see.” So it’s this little circle of sourcing each other.
It’s like two criminals providing each other an alibi.”
But as for the rest of them - I guess they’re just
“shocked, shocked” to find there’s corruption going on here, even as
they attempt to find reasons to allow these people to continue in their
corruption. Apparently they also need to go along to get along in order to play
the game.
Here’s another interesting quote from Casablanca I find applicable.
Renault: Rick, there are many exit visas sold in this
café, but we know that you've never sold one. That is the reason we permit you
to remain open.
Rick: Oh? I thought it was because I let you win at
roulette.
Renault: That is another reason.
Nothing is ever as it seems, except to remember that
corruption is always part of the human equation. However, since leftism has no
moral foundation we should expect higher levels of corruption in everything
they do. In their case it’s not a conspiracy. It’s intrinsic to leftist character!
Here's one more quote that could help define most of the media, conservative
and liberal:
Renault: I have no
conviction, if that's what you mean. I blow with the wind, and the prevailing
wind happens to be from Vichy.
The difference between Captain Renault and the media? He
was honest about his corruption! Now we have clarity!
Ken Starr, the Special Prosecutor in the Clinton case, was vilified and made to look stupid by the media constantly. Even stalking Starr outside his home and asking him questions when he went outside to throw
out the garbage in his bathrobe.
Starr in effect admitted his naivete saying the optics never occurred to him as he didn't want to be rude, as the reporters were just doing their job. Now that's naive, true, but that's how descent people act.
The media isn't descent, they're not honest, and they're corrupt to the bone. Why did it take so long for everyone to grasp that? And Walter Cronkite, "The most trusted man in America", was just as guilty. He was a secret globalist, and the Pravda media, aka, the Fourth Estate still is.
Far from being something mysterious, the power of suggestion is
often a part of everyday life.....Simply put, a person is “suggestible” if he or she accepts and acts
on suggestions by others. Suggestions can range from lies to
misunderstandings to incorrect perceptions (like the caffeine example).
In other words, your mind, and in some cases, your body, will trick you
into believing that something is – or isn’t – true.......
He goes on to say:
Researchers warn against confusing “suggestibility” with
“susceptibility.” Susceptibility refers to a physical weakness or
predisposition, like being susceptible to colds. Though suggestibility
is more mental......The famous saying, “There’s a sucker
born every minute” may be true — but only where critical thinking is
ignored, discouraged or outlawed.
The Pravda media has knowingly and corruptly spewed out lies of commission, lies of omission, misinformation, and fake news for decades placing a mammoth thumb on America's election scales.
The bias, from both the mainstream media and the tech/social media is mind-boggling. The problem isn’t that Democrats openly and habitually lie about Donald Trump on a regular basis. The problem is that the media uses subliminal messaging to reinforce
those lies. They are not fair, neutral arbiters.
The media are
Democrats, by and large. For example, Democrat strategist Aisha Mills recently appeared on
Erin Burnett’s show on CNN [whose] insane rant naturally invoked Hitler, but ranged from
eugenics (What? Planned Parenthood and Margaret Sanger are icons within
the Democrat party, and she wants to complain about eugenics?) to her
personal belief, based on nothing but her own emotion, that Donald Trump
considers himself superior to her because of her genetics due to her
identity a black lesbian. ...........
The
fact is the real reason Trump is so popular is because of the internet.
So many alternative news site popped up overnight, like American Thinker, all of which what's called the "Fourth Estate", and is in reality the Pravda media, arrogantly, smugly, and
dismissively called the alternative media the "Pajama Media", and that's now morphed into the 'Fifth Estate" because as more and more
Americans read what was being said they realized just how badly they'd
been lied to by the Pravda Media.
Viewers Abandoned CNN, MSNBC After Election. In the aftermath of the 2024 U.S. presidential election, Fox
News experienced significant gains in viewership. The network captured
62 percent of the overall cable news audience, marking its highest cable
news share to date. On Election Night and during Vice President Kamala
Harris's concession, Fox News was the most-watched network. ( More Here, and Here)
Even the Food Network is doing better than CNN, and Silvio Canto says he understands why, "their chefs and recipes must have more
credibility than the news readers" at these networks.
America is now acutely aware of how badly they've been lied to and have walked away from these networks. Once that happened, they never went
back, and those numbers have increased yearly, until now, Now those numbers
are massive, and to the point the Pravda media, both print and
television, are going down the sewer, and are on the chopping block to
be sold, and soon, probably at fire sale prices, and for two reasons.
Their viewership is
far left and they will not tolerate conservative views being shown, so they
can't change who and what they are to expand their viewership, and very
soon they're going to lose all that lovely, lovely bundling money.
Streaming is going to bankrupt cable. Cable is dying and being taken over by streaming, and when cable dies,
all that lovely, lovely, bundling money will dry up, and worse yet,
their ratings as bad as they were, nosedived after the election. They tried streaming with MSNBC+ and it failed almost overnight, so they know with their message they can't
generate sufficient income on their own. They're toast.
Poor Jim Acosta, a virtual lava flow horsepucky is in a panic over this settlement as he fears getting sued, and if he does, he want's the company to bail him out. It never occurred to them all their lies would constitute "actual malice" under the New York Times V. Sullivan SCOTUS ruling that I think is a disgraceful decision that has absolutely no basis in the Constitution and unleashed onto America corrupt media liars who worked
to destroy the lives of people they disapproved of, and it's time to
end this insanity and force the media to live by the same standards as
the rest of America has to live by.
Then we have the fall of RINO Never Trumpers like Peggy Noonan, who was lauded a lot in years gone by and even then I had no idea why.
I read her stuff, and even at that much younger age, with much less
experience in life, and much less knowledge, I wasn't impressed. I
always came away with the thought I had no idea what she was trying to
say, and neither did she. This piece explains why. She wants it both
ways, always needing an out, always needing an excuse for failure, just
like all the "it's not my fault" leftists they hobnob with.
She's
like so many of these faux conservatives, they like the attention, the
parties, the ability to rub shoulders with prominent leftists of the
media, presenting themselves as enlightened, but they've never they been
warriors. Jonah Goldberg came close and then capitulated. George
Will, Krauthammer, and Bill Kristol, whose father Irving was a communist/socialist at one point and became the "godfather of neoconservatism", which explains a lot about
the views of his son, all of whom had the same problem that
afflicts so many "intellectuals", a sense of elitist privilege.
I've seen this type in
a thousand places and a thousand faces, but they're all the same, they
present a face of arrogance and smugness to hide their inadequacies, and
are totally uncomfortable in the presence of the peasantry as they live in a echo chamber of head nodders.
As has been
quoted so often, "There are liars, there are damn liars, and there are
statistics",. so when you combine a political persuasion notorious for
lies, and can only subsist on lies, a corrupt media that loves those
lies, and pollsters who corruptly know they're lies and yet work to make
lies those truth, we had a public that was been beguiled for decades.
Then
the internet appeared and then, "Shazam" the "Captain
Marvel", alternative media appeared, AKA, the pajama media, now the new "Fifth Estate", which the
Pravda media smugly and arrogantly smirked at. Well, that's over with,
the smirk is gone, the smirking turned into hate mongering, their network
programs are swirling down the drain, and now the corporate Pravda, Fourth Estate media, is irrelevant, and it's clear the new administration is going to open things up that will place the "Fourth Estate" in a back row seat, where they've belonged for decades.
He who laughs last laughs
best. Schadenfreude!
Two more points.
First, this attack against a corrupt media is going to continue, as "U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA)
shared details about her plans for a brand new House subcommittee tasked
with cutting wasteful government spending and redundant bureaucracy", saying among the things, they'll be addressing taxpayer money being used to fund NPR or any media outlet for that matter.
Secondly, for those who may doubt the vile corruption we're seeing from the Pravda media is something new and novel, I would like to draw your attention to an article I originally published in 2011, The Lady is a Hag.
The claim some time has been the Main Stream Media, or as I call it the Pravda media, has lost all credibility. The debates sealed that claim. What was the media's biggest beef with J.D. Vance? The man had the audacity to confidently smile. Imagine that. Did he shout, scowl, wave his arms in outrage, bang his fits on the podium? No, he did much worse, and it was far more "chilling". He outrageously " put on a mask of likability and empathy.” That was unforgivable male toxicity. After a face crime such as that, how does he even dare "breathe in the air we breathe on this planet! ” But that was from Maureen Dowd, as far left loon a as there is.
In Discover the Networks, Dowd is described as a "narcissistic
writer tending to reduce “all political
phenomena .... to caricatures of the personalities", who finds it
“easier to whine than to take a
stand or offer solutions". Her "favorite
rhetorical device is parallelism", which is like a the logical fallacy of
inappropriate comparisons. Claims anyone who opposed abortion suffers
from "mental impairment", and is an unending race baiter, and I think
the real reason she dislikes Vance so much is she identifies as one J.D. Vance's childless cat ladies, just like Kamala Harris, "who
hadn’t procreated.... were “miserable”
and had no “direct stake” in the country", whether she owns a cat or not.
The arrogance of the "stars" of the Pravda Media is beyond the pale, Stephanopoulos says "he will not continue with any interview with a Republican if they
won't concede Joe Biden won in 2020. He won't allow any discussion of voter fraud, or watered down ballot rules. Nitwits like him "think it's journalistic malpractice to do a live interview with President Trump on television." Why? Because if it's live they can't contort what was said as they've done over and over again with taped interviews.
Then we have Morning Joe Scarborough,who has been described as America's Baghdad Bob. You remember Baghdad Bob don't you? He was "Saddam Hussein’s Information Minister,
Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf", who '"ludicrously claimed “The infidels are
committing suicide by the hundreds on the gates of Baghdad.” "Americans “are
going to surrender or be burned in their tanks. They will surrender, it
is they who will surrender." The next day Baghdad fell.
Joe Scarborough? At one point, he was considered a
conservative Republican congressman from Florida. Today, he is a
disgraceful fool spouting a never-ending array of talking points for
President Joe Biden on cable news. His credibility as a journalist,
although never very impressive, has completely evaporated. His performances on MSNBC have become so laughable that the
comparisons to “Baghdad Bob” are impossible to ignore.
Scarborough
claims former President Donald Trump was “preparing for civil war.”
What triggered that statement? Well, he quotes Trump saying:
“Those who want to stop us from
achieving this future have slandered me, impeached me, indicted me,
tried to throw me off the ballot. And who knows? Maybe even tried to
kill me.”.....“You know, I always say there is an
enemy from within, and there is an outside enemy. If you are smart, the
outside enemy is not going to be a problem. Russia, China, North Korea,
we are not going to have a problem if you have a smart president. If you
have not such a smart president then it’s a problem. We have an enemy
from within, which I think is much more dangerous than the outside
enemy.”
How does Scarborough define all those true statements? He calls that a stunning level of un-American activity.
“The level of un-American activity that you just
saw is stunning. That is un-American. They know they’re lying. Donald
Trump knows that’s a lie. He will tell you that the Secret Service, he
thought, did the best job they could do. The fact that JD Vance and
Trump’s family would out and out say what they said takes the threat of
violence takes the threat beyond where it was even leading up to January
6. This is an increasingly desperate person, an increasingly desperate
family, who is preparing for civil war. They just are.”
And the list of outrageous statements by Scarborough and his team are listed in the linked artilce, go there and see clearly they're all about "punishing Trump, coddling Biden". And "this is what our media elite considers a well-functioning democracy and apolitical justice", and the reason I call them the Pravda media.
There's no debate or interview that won't be a designed trap to make conservatives look bad, and a lot of that is backfiring as conservatives have given up any idea the media will play fair. They won't, and now people like J.D. Vance are prepared to deal with them, and even challenge them.
The mainstream media no longer pursues truth. It is a puppet of the
political establishment and will demonize anyone who dares question
their establishment-approved narratives. Labeling everyday Americans as
“conspiracy theorists” and purveyors of “disinformation,” the media has
weaponized its platforms to shield political elites rather than holding
them accountable. From silencing critical stories like Hunter Biden’s laptop to ridiculing valid concerns about COVID vaccines, the mainstream media has consistently acted as the enforcer of the political machine, not a champion of truth.
As
the facts came to light, many of the stories they dismissed and
suppressed have been vindicated—exposing not only the media’s bias but
also the lengths they’ll go to discredit those who challenge their
carefully constructed narratives. Here are four of the most shocking
lies the mainstream media purported to protect their leftist political
elites that absolutely destroy their credibility:
Lie #1: The Hunter Biden laptop theory is Russian disinformation.....
Lie #2: The COVID lab-leak theory is a conspiracy theory.....
Lie #3: COVID vaccines are safe and effective.....
Lie #4: Joe Biden's mental state is "not" declining.....
Actually, while those are four excellent examples, the amount of vile and corrupt lies of commission, lies of omission, logical fallacies, and projection, spewed out by these corrupt misfits is much larger than just these four examples, actually going back a hundred years, and probably just as long as news organizations have existed.
Don't believe your lyin' eyes, and certainly do not believe the scores of fellow citizens who, under oath, signed affidavits and testified about the fraud those lying eyes witnessed.
Put this behind you. Move on. Just forget it. But you can't. You probably want to, particularly as your spouse complains about how tense you seem these days. Fraud
is an ugly thing, even when it happens to someone else. When it
happens to you, or at least to the guy you were voting for, even if you
did not like his tweets, it is a bit more personal.
Children
are born with a fear of loud noises. It is one of their only innate
fears. They do not fear hot stoves; they do not fear loaded pistols;
they do not fear that pot of boiling water. They learn about those
dangers soon enough. Children
are also born with a sense of justice. It is inherent, innate, in
there somewhere. Everyone, or about everyone, has it. Angry voices
make them cry. Witnessing someone harming an animal is horrible to
them. It should remain so. Something immediately angers a child when
someone cuts in line. That
innate sense of justice, right and wrong, is why you remain tense and
your spouse tells you so. It is why you just cannot get over it.
There's another reason. It is uglier..........It doesn't have an endpoint............To Read More....
She's like so many of these faux conservatives, they like the attention, the parties, the ability to rub shoulders with prominent leftists of the media, presenting themselves as enlightened, but they've never they been warriors. Jonah Goldberg came close and then capitulated. George Will, Krauthammer, and Bill Kristol, whose father Irving was a communist/socialist at one point and became the "godfather of neoconservatism", which explains a lot about the views of his son, all of whom had the same problem that afflicts so many "intellectuals", a sense of elitist privilege.
I've seen this type in a thousand places and a thousand faces, but they're all the same, they present a face of arrogance and smugness to hide their inadequacies, and are totally uncomfortable in the presence of the peasantry as they live in a echo chamber of head nodders.