April 22, 2023 by
Dan Mitchell
@ International Liberty I’m a great fan of nature, but our friends on the left seem a bit extreme.
Today, though, let’s analyze the the supposed environmentalists who think children are a net minus to society.
A professor of history at the University of Chicago, Peggy O’Donnell Heffington, has a column in the Washington Post about this topic. Here are some excerpts.
One
of the most striking trends is the number of students who have told me
they feel robbed of the ability to have children, cheated out of
parenthood by decades of climate denial and inaction by baby boomers and
their own Gen X parents. My students are not alone.
A global survey in 2021 of 10,000 people between the ages of 16 and 25
shows…60 percent told researchers they felt “very” or “extremely”
worried about climate change. …nearly 4 in 10 said they were “hesitant
to have children.” …the carbon footprint of a baby born in the United
States is gigantic; having one fewer child cuts emissions far more than
giving up airplanes, meat or automobiles. …My students aren’t talking
about the carbon footprints of babies. They’re talking about grief,
about a future that has been lost.
This is not a new issue, by the way. I wrote way back in 2009 about some people getting sterilized to make sure they don’t inadvertently create a kid.
As a libertarian,
it’s not my role to tell people to have kids. Or not to have kids. But I
can’t resist opining that it’s bizarrely illogical to get so depressed
about the possibility of a warming planet.
Even if you fully believe every apocalyptic prediction from the most hysterical environmentalist (and support their radical agenda), the net impact of a few kids presumably is akin to pouring a glass of water in a big lake.
Yes, the water level changes, but the net impact is utterly trivial.
P.S. If you want climate humor, click here and here.
No comments:
Post a Comment