SCOTUS, Federalism and America's Brownshirts

Anonymous Guest

All these recent Supreme Court decisions have a common underlying theme independent of the individual issues: drawing a line in the sand about, or even reversing, the infinitely metastatic Progressive strategy of conjuring “rights” out of thin air, and expanding Federal government powers in blatant defiance of the Constitution. Dobbs was the perfect centerpiece to the Court’s strategy because public sentiment is both polarized and passionate. 

Abortion is perhaps the one issue about which the Court could rely on massive and vocal public assistance from supporters of its decision. The other cases (EPA, NYC gun laws, coach’s prayer, etc.) are merely sidebars.   During their previous control of the Court, Progressives successfully removed public debate and process from the legislative arena, thereby accelerating implementation of their agenda while minimizing exposure of individual legislators to controversial positions. In doing so, incumbent politicians gained immense advantages by remaining all things to all people. As incumbents of both parties benefit, neither challenged this paradigm when in power.

However, the perhaps unintended consequence of the Progressive strategy has been to marginalize the legislative branch of government. Unless having overwhelming national importance (for example, Obamacare), individual issues are rarely addressed, debated, or decided. Instead, the nation endures the feeble spectacle of “omnibus” bills that no one writes or reads or remotely understands, but are merely approved under the institutionally-generated “threat” of government shutdowns. 

 

Indirectly, the Court is attempting to restore power and authority to the legislative process, both of which come with the awful price of responsibility. After working so hard for so long to shed that responsibility, is there any wonder that the Democrats are so angry and the Republicans so relatively silent? 

 

What's frightening are how these "Progressives" protest. 

•  It is truly frightening to many Americans to see that fences have to be put up around the Supreme Court out of fear there will be violence when decisions go against Democrats. 
•  Americans are frightened when they see protests outside of Supreme Court homes. 
• Americans are frightened when Democrat leadership supports the violence and protests at someone's home 

They know that if the leftists can do this to a Supreme Court justice, they can do it to anyone - and that is their goal. 

 

The Courts affirmation of the right to self defense is so important. Even California observes the "castle doctrine".  No one can enter your home and threaten your life as long as you have the means, the expertise, and the will to defend yourself and your family. The implementation of that right is frightening to many people. But there comes a time when such precautions become necessary. 

 

Editor's Note:  Finally, let's try and get this once, just once, please.  Fascism isn't a right wing concept, it's a leftist movement.  It's merely the right wing of the socialist movement while communism is the left wing, but they're two sides of the same coin.  So socialist called themselves progressives in America starting in the late 1800's in order to disguise the fact they were socialists.  And the reason why is because socialism is fundamentally atheistic and that wasn't going to float in America in those days.  

 

In short, they've played a masquerade on America.  They lied then, they lie now, they will lie tomorrow.   And violence has been their mode of operation from their very beginning, as were the Brown Shirts of Nazi Germany.  Nothing has changed for them!  We've abandoned our traditional Judaic/Christian values and ethics making America intellectually, emotionally and philosophically weak and vulnerable to their corruption.   We really do need to get that. RK