Ann Coulter
Posted: Nov 29, 2017
At least liberals are finally telling the truth about Bill Clinton -- and just 20 years after it mattered! Of course, considering it took the Democratic Party a century to discover that slavery was wrong, two decades is lightning speed for these moral paragons.
While edging up to admitting that Bill Clinton maybe shouldn't have raped Juanita Broaddrick and flashed Paula Jones, liberals still can't own up to their utterly hypocritical defense of a president credibly accused of repeated sexual assaults and associated felonies.
Recently, The New York Times' Maureen Dowd tried to cover up the left's shameful response to Clinton's sleazy behavior with the "both sides" argument. According to Dowd, liberals "tried to kill off" Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas "over sex when the real reason they wanted to get rid of him was politics." And then conservatives "tried to kill off a Democratic president over sex when the real reason they wanted to get rid of him was politics."
Here are three important differences off the top of my head:.........To Read More....
My Take - Just a bit of schadenfreude. From the beginning I knew Anita Hill was a liar - and it appears now - the leftist in the media did also. Yet their constant refrain was - "You men just don't get it!" Now as this breaks they insist on bringing up Clearance Thomas - who I consider the one legitimate conservative and original constructionist on the court - but this time it's different. They're admitting they knew Anita Hill was lying all along. It must be real agony for Hill to know this is her legacy, and this is how she'll go down in history. Another lying liberal "icon" that was a "useful idiot".
No comments:
Post a Comment